Assessment
Process gives feedback somewhere to land.
When a student submits only a polished translation, it is hard to know whether the problem was vocabulary, syntax, morphology, or revision. Visible intermediate work changes the conversation.
A teacher can ask why a case was chosen, why an ambiguity was resolved, or where the draft stopped following the source.
Review prompts
Questions worth asking during review.
- Which word is the finite verb, and what subject does it support?
- Which case decision changed the meaning most?
- Which gloss helped, and which gloss misled?
- Where did the readable draft move away from the close draft?
- What uncertainty should remain open?
Classroom boundary
AI comparison belongs after student work.
If AI appears first, it can become an answer to imitate. If it appears after the student has made visible choices, it becomes a comparison object: useful, questionable, and discussable.
viaFlaminia
How viaFlaminia helps teachers
viaFlaminia saves sentence focus, glosses, tags, and drafts as part of the work. That makes review more concrete because teacher and learner can point to the exact decision that needs attention.
A teacher can only assess reasoning that the workflow makes visible.
Classroom ruleKeep learning
Use these guides as a method, not a shortcut. The stronger habit is to make each translation decision visible before accepting a final English sentence.
FAQ
Before you start.
Does viaFlaminia grade translations automatically?
No. It is a structured workspace for visible reasoning, not an automatic grading system.
Can it replace teacher feedback?
No. It is meant to make feedback more grounded by preserving the student's process.